Citation

McDermott BE, Edens JF, Quanbeck CD, Busse D, Scott CL. Law Hum. Behav. 2007; 32(4): 325-338.

Affiliation

Department of Psychiatry, UC Davis School of Medicine, 2230 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1007/s10979-007-9094-8

PMID

17597388

Abstract

Although the construct of psychopathy is related to community violence and recidivism in various populations, empirical evidence suggests that its association with institutional aggression is weak at best. The current study examined, via both variable-level and group-level analyses, the relationship between standard violence risk instruments, which included a measure of psychopathy, and institutional violence. Additionally, the incremental validity of dynamic risk factors also was examined. The results suggest that PCL-R was only weakly related to institutional aggression and only then when the behavioral (Factor 2) aspects of the construct were examined. The clinical and risk management scales on the HCR-20, impulsivity, anger, and psychiatric symptoms all were useful in identifying patients at risk for exhibiting institutional aggression. These data suggest that factors other than psychopathy, including dynamic risk factors, may be most useful in identifying forensic patients at higher risk for exhibiting aggression.

Language: en