SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Impedovo D, Balducci F, Dentamaro V, Pirlo G. Sensors (Basel) 2019; 19(23): s19235213.

Affiliation

Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, 70125 Bari, Italy.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

DOI

10.3390/s19235213

PMID

31795080

Abstract

Automatic traffic flow classification is useful to reveal road congestions and accidents. Nowadays, roads and highways are equipped with a huge amount of surveillance cameras, which can be used for real-time vehicle identification, and thus providing traffic flow estimation. This research provides a comparative analysis of state-of-the-art object detectors, visual features, and classification models useful to implement traffic state estimations. More specifically, three different object detectors are compared to identify vehicles. Four machine learning techniques are successively employed to explore five visual features for classification aims. These classic machine learning approaches are compared with the deep learning techniques. This research demonstrates that, when methods and resources are properly implemented and tested, results are very encouraging for both methods, but the deep learning method is the most accurately performing one reaching an accuracy of 99.9% for binary traffic state classification and 98.6% for multiclass classification.


Language: en

Keywords

benchmark; deep learning; vehicular traffic congestion; vehicular traffic flow classification; vehicular traffic flow detection; video classification

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print