SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Marcusson-Clavertz D, Persson SD, Davidson P, Kim J, Cardeña E, Kuehner C. Conscious. Cogn. 2022; 107: e103447.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.concog.2022.103447

PMID

36469956

Abstract

Individuals who sleep poorly report spending more time mind wandering during the day. However, past research has relied on self-report measures of sleep or measured mind wandering during laboratory tasks, which prevents generalization to everyday contexts. We used ambulatory assessments to examine the relations between several features of sleep (duration, fragmentation, and disturbances) and mind wandering (task-unrelated, stimulus-independent, and unguided thoughts). Participants wore a wristband device that collected actigraphy and experience-sampling data across 7 days and 8 nights. Contrary to our expectations, task-unrelated and stimulus-independent thoughts were not associated with sleep either within- or between-persons (n = 164). Instead, individual differences in unguided thoughts were associated with sleep disturbances and duration, suggesting that individuals who more often experience unguided train-of-thoughts have greater sleep disturbances and sleep longer. These results highlight the need to consider the context and features of mind wandering when relating it to sleep.


Language: en

Keywords

Total sleep time; Daily diary; Ecological momentary assessments (EMA); Fragmentation index; Guilt/fear-of-failure daydreaming; Guilty-dysphoric daydreaming; Mind-wandering; Positive-constructive daydreaming; Spontaneous cognition; Task-unrelated thoughts

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print