Citation

Pezdek K. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 1994; 8(4): 339-350.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/acp.2350080404

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In this commentary on the paper, Psychotherapy and Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Cognitive Perspective, by Lindsay and Read, three points are addressed. First, although the bulk of Lindsay and Read's paper is devoted to elaborating an explanation for the phenomenon that 'memory recovery therapies' may 'inadvertently lead some adult clients to create illusory memories of childhood sexual abuse', this phenomenon itself has never been demonstrated. There is a logical flaw in inferring the existence of a phenomenon from the fact that there might be an explanation for it. Second, Signal Detection Theory (SDT) is proposed as a useful heuristic for conceptualizing the debate regarding true memory versus illusory memory for sexual abuse. SDT is applied to elucidate the phenomenon of memory for sexual abuse, and then several directions for future research on this topic using the SDT framework are proposed. Finally, the cognitive research literature on the prevalence of suggestively planted memories is discussed. It is proposed that 'memory recovery therapy' is not widespread in the field of psychotherapy and that the evidence for therapist-implanted illusory memories for incestuous sexual abuse is very weak.

Language: en